
When
I contacted Etymotic’s UK distributor for a review set of ER6i’s,
they were only able to provide the standard black ER6’s. Not a
problem I thought, there’s only a slight difference between the 2
product’s specs – a lighter load to drive and a slight bass boost.
However, I now wish I had received the ER6i’s. Nevertheless, the
differences withstanding, there are more similarities that make this
review relevant to iPod/generic MP3 users thinking of throwing a
decent (if not considerable) amount at a new pair of earphones.
If you happen to be one such user trying to decide who gets your
hard-earned at the end of this month, the definitely consider the
Etymotics as a potential contender. In talking about the ER6’s, it
has to be said that you will more than likely tend to run your
iPod’s volume in the upper end of it’s range, and probably engage
the EQ for Bass Boost to even out the response of these
inner-earphone. These are the opposite of the Future Sonics I
reviewed a while ago, where they needed a top end lift to sound
spot-on. The ER6’s are definitely bass shy, even with the volume
turned up. They are also one of the best design of inner-earphones
I’ve had the pleasure to use for prolonged periods, better than the
Future Sonics, better than the Shure E3cs. Their shape is quite
different for a professional ear-monitor, given that is where they
ply their trade first and foremost. The iPod aftermarket is only
just a new direction for them, and hence the modified version – ER6i
– being the result. Certainly the clear earphones and white wires
make them more appealing to the iPod users, who wish to maintain the
white theme started by the earbuds provided with the iPod by
default.
In terms of sonics, like the majority of
replacement earphones or cutdown professional ear-monitors, they let
you hear into the music more and communicate more of what it is
about the music that makes you enjoy it – whether it be more clearly
defined lyrics, the bass resounding through your head, or the
driving rhythm of the song being more fully delineated.
Going back to the design, the oblong shape, at
first, seems awkward and anticipated to be uncomfortable. That is
not the case, but using the silicon flanges provided, required that
they be inserted further than other earphones/monitors, that used
foam to fill the ear canal. As far as noise reduction is concerned,
the flanges do a good job, but don’t take things as far as the foam
ones do. The difference is noticeably slight – perhaps a few dB.
This difference will only be relevant if you use the ER6’s with your
iPod/MP3 player and/or if you are in a fairly noisy environment, as
you may run out of volume to drown out the background noise to a
similar level as that of the Future Sonics/Shures or the ER6i’s.
Given
the price difference between the ER6 and ER6i’s is only £10 or so,
then you really ought to go for the latter unless you are also a
performing musician, and plan to make use of the ER6’s in a gigging
capacity, where you can play with an equalizer to get the sound you
desire, on stage. If it’s purely for an iPod usage, then grab the
ER6i’s – they will play louder or at a lower volume setting on your
iPod for a given SPL (sound pressure level), and with the added bass
boost, preserve battery life (however much or little) by not needing
that extra function turned on.
I’m very impressed with the Etymotics, and can
heartily recommend them to anyone planning on moving up to the next
level of earphones, once their original earbuds are considered
inadequate.
Again, I’ll remind those reading, that if your
music predominantly contains tracks encoded at 128 kbps (the same as
those bought via Apple’s iTunes Music Store), you may start hearing
distortions of certain instruments, that were masked by the original
earbuds. It’s not a fault, just a trade off of low bit rates and
smaller file sizes with superior earphones’ resolution capabilities.
Encode a few tracks you’re very familiar with at 192 kbps (AAC/MP3,
doesn’t matter) and you’ll immediately hear the difference.
The Etymotic ER6’s (and I presume the ER6i’s)
come in a neat little zippered pouch, with additional earpieces to
play around with, to get the best solution for you, with. It’s
surprising how small the overall presentation is, and doesn’t
impress given the cost, initially. However, once you’ve connected
the earphones to the iPod/MP3 player, and start listening with them,
that aspect soon gets forgotten about and you find yourself immersed
in a clarity of sound that makes you realise they were worth the
money spent on them.
Are
they the best earphones for their money? That’s a tough call – for
the price, £100 for the ER6i’s, they make a very persuasive
argument. However, they might face a bit of competition towards the
end of the year, when Future Sonics / ExtremeMac’s joint development
arrives for a similar price or less. For now, though, if I had to
decide between the Etymotics and the Shures, I’d hard pushed to
decide either way. One difference other than price, might be that
the Shure E3c’s have a thicker cable, and therefore could be
considered as being more robust. A similar point with the Future
Sonics – which isn’t to say thin cables are necessarily weak by
default, but just the impression you might think when looking at the
2 or 3 brands, and deciding who gets the nod.


Review by - PJ Skelton
Published - 19/06/2005
More Headphone Reviews-
[ Up ] [ Sennheiser PX100 Review ] [ Sennheiser HD497 Headphones ] [ Future Sonics EM3 ] [ Bluetake BT420EX Review ] [ Shure E3c ] [ Shure E2c ] [ Sennheiser HD 650 ] [ PX250 Sennheiser Headphones ] [ Westone UM2 Review ] [ Shure E500PTH Review ] [ Cresyn LMX-E630 ] [ Bose Quiet Comfort 3 ] [ Shure SE110 Review ] [ Soundwise G3 Earphones ] [ Yahba Opus Review ] [ Jabra BT620s Review ] [ V-Moda Vibe Earphones ] [ Soundwise S1 Earphones ] [ EzEars SX50 Review ] [ Sony Fontopia Headphones ] [ Etymotic ER6i ] |